{"id":31864,"date":"2019-01-19T11:02:09","date_gmt":"2019-01-19T10:02:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T12:38:05","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T10:38:05","slug":"ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/","title":{"rendered":"[M&#038;A] Attribution of Knowledge\u2014Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding\u2014But Who Holds the Information?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wpb-content-wrapper\"><p>[vc_row][vc_column][vc_video link=&#8221;https:\/\/youtu.be\/Lu788xTNlR4&#8243; el_width=&#8221;50&#8243; align=&#8221;center&#8221;][vc_column_text]<em>It is common for a buyer, following the acquisition of a company, the acquirer\u2014dissatisfied with the business\u2014attempts to seek compensation for damages based on the withholding of material information or tries to have the contract rescinded on the grounds of fraud or fraudulent concealment.<span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">M&#038;A: Attribution of Knowledge\u2014Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding of Information\u2014But Who Holds the Information? <\/span> <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The buyer faces two sets of problems:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>In practice, it is the target company that holds most of the information relevant to the acquirer. However, the contracting party subject to a duty to disclose information\u2014or who may be liable for fraud\u2014is usually the seller. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Furthermore, if the transferor is a legal entity, the thorny question arises as to what knowledge can be attributed to a company. Since a legal entity cannot, in practical terms, possess information\u2014as it lacks a memory\u2014it will necessarily be necessary to attribute to it the knowledge held by natural persons, who will be either the officers or employees of the transferor or those of the target company. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">From this perspective, how can we determine the scope of individuals and recording media whose knowledge and content will be attributed to the transferor\u2014who is very often a legal entity\u2014with legal effect during precontractual negotiations?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">These issues are all the more relevant given that the recent reform of French contract law has enshrined, in Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721&#038;idArticle=LEGIARTI000032007138\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">1112-1<\/a> of the Civil Code, the pre-contractual duty to disclose information, which has its origins in case law. According to the new provision, this obligation to disclose information is limited to information of which a party is actually aware, implicitly excluding information that is not available to that party. An obligation to make inquiries was not included in the final version of the reform.  <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">With regard to fraud, the reform of contract law has also codified the case law concerning the exceptional attribution to the other party of fraud committed by a third party (Art. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI000032040987&#038;cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721&#038;dateTexte=20161001\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">1138<\/a> of the Civil Code).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It is interesting to examine this issue from the perspective of comparative law, and more specifically German law, which in recent years has seen several court decisions and a wealth of legal scholarship on the subject. While German law has indeed addressed the issue of the attribution of knowledge (<em>Wissenszurechnung<\/em>)\u2014without limiting itself to the areas of precontractual disclosure or fraud\u2014French law, for its part, has remained hesitant on this subject. <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>        <span style=\"color: #000080;\">  <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">  I. The Attribution of Knowledge in German Law  <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">German case law and legal doctrine have developed two approaches to determining whether (or not) to attribute to the assignor\u2014and more specifically to a legal entity\u2014the knowledge of a third party with respect to that contract: first, under German law, the acts and negligence of the person whom the contracting party uses to fulfill its precontractual or contractual obligations are attributed to the latter (<em>Erf\u00fcllungsgehilfe<\/em>, agent) <strong>(a)<\/strong>); second, case law draws an analogy with the provisions relating to representation <strong>(b)<\/strong>).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>    <span style=\"color: #000080;\">  a) The \u201cagent\u201d (<em>Erf\u00fcllungsgehilfe<\/em>)  <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While the actions and knowledge of its own agents are normally attributed to the legal entity, case law employs the concept of <em>*Erf\u00fcllungsgehilfe*<\/em> to attribute either fraudulent concealment or active fraud, or a breach of the duty to disclose, to the contracting party, particularly the transferor (<em>Verhaltungszurechnung<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, the seller may be held liable for the actions of its own employees whom it used, for example, to set up the data room or to conduct the negotiations. The same principle applies to the target company with respect to the bodies and employees involved in the negotiations. The question of whether the seller made use of the person in question must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. The seller must therefore be very careful when organizing the negotiation process.   <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>          <span style=\"color: #000080;\">b) Representation in knowledge (<em>Wissenzurechnung<\/em>)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The second approach relies on the provisions governing representation: if the validity of consent depends on the knowledge of a party, it is the representative\u2019s knowledge that is taken into account, not that of the represented party itself (Section 166 of the German Civil Code (<em>B\u00fcrgerliches Gesetzbuch, \u201cBGB\u201d<\/em>)). The knowledge of a company\u2019s representative is therefore, in principle, attributed to that company. By applying this provision analogously, German courts have extended these provisions to other persons classified as \u201cknowledge representatives \u201d (<em><sup><strong>Wissensvertreter\u00b9<\/strong><\/sup>)<\/em>, particularly when a natural person is entrusted with the task of obtaining and recording information on behalf of a legal entity and, where applicable, transmitting it. This may notably be the case for individuals involved in <em>due diligence<\/em> who do not necessarily hold positions within the transferring company. This concept is also applied to the definition of <em>\u201cbest knowledge\u201d <\/em>in liability warranty clauses.    <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This analogy is justified by the concept of contractual equality (<em>Gleichstellung<\/em>): its purpose is to ensure that a legal entity\u2019s counterparty is not placed in a less favorable position than if it were negotiating with a natural person.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>        <span style=\"color: #000080;\">  (c) Contractual Arrangements<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It is important to note that under German law, the parties may modify these provisions by contract. Thus, it is possible to exclude liability for an <em>Erf\u00fcllungsgehilfe<\/em>, even in cases of intentional misconduct (outside of standard-form contracts), or to preclude the attribution of the \u201crepresentative\u2019s\u201d knowledge. <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Such clauses must be drafted very carefully and clearly in order to precisely define their scope of application. Liability for fraud, however, cannot be excluded. <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">&#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>          <span style=\"color: #000080;\">II. The Incomplete Framework for the Attribution of Knowledge in French Law   <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Unlike under German law, no legal provision treats the representative as an indicator of the principal\u2019s actions or knowledge, and <em>a fortiori<\/em>, the knowledge of a natural person as an indicator of the knowledge attributed to a legal entity. Similarly, the former provisions of the Civil Code provided, without further clarification, that fraud must originate from a party to the contract, thereby generally excluding fraud committed by a third party. <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">With regard to a legal entity\u2019s knowledge, the Court of Cassation had recognized only the attribution of knowledge of information to its legal representative<sup><strong>2<\/strong><\/sup>. Thus, in the context of an acquisition, the legal representative\u2019s knowledge was, in principle, attributed to the transferring company, and withholding that knowledge could lead to a finding of fraud, or, <em>a fortiori<\/em>, to a simple withholding of material information. <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Case law had established other exceptions to this rule regarding fraud. The reform of contract law has now enshrined these exceptions in the Civil Code (Art. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI000032040987&#038;cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721&#038;dateTexte=20161001\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">1138<\/a>): fraud committed by <em>a \u201crepresentative, agent, employee, or guarantor of the contracting party,\u201d<\/em> as well as by a third party acting in \u201ccollusion,\u201d is to be attributed to the other contracting party. The legal codification of these judicial precedents and the inclusion of \u201ccollusion\u201d could reinforce this broad approach to fraud through the attribution of knowledge. This could provide a basis for determining which natural persons\u2014including third parties to the contract\u2014and which storage media possess or contain information that can be attributed to a legal entity.   <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On the other hand\u2014and this would be more difficult to accept under German law\u2014a third party (such as the target company) that commits a fraudulent act may be required to pay damages to the victim of the fraud on the basis of tort liability.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, in the event of fraudulent conduct by a third party toward the transferring company, the transferee also has a claim against that third party based on tort liability<sup><strong>3<\/strong><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, the concepts remain vague. Could the \u201crepresentative of the know-how\u201d therefore be, as in German law, a person whom the transferor has authorized to organize the data room or to negotiate the contracts? The issue is not clearly settled under general law<sup><strong>4<\/strong><\/sup>.  <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Furthermore, the question of the extent to which Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI000032040987&#038;cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721&#038;dateTexte=20161001\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">1138<\/a> of the Civil Code can be regarded as defining the scope of persons whose knowledge should be attributed to the party subject to the duty to disclose (beyond fraudulent concealment) is not at issue. Yet it remains an important issue. Due to the difference between fraudulent concealment and the duty to disclose, Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI000032040987&#038;cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070721&#038;dateTexte=20161001\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">1138<\/a> cannot be applied by analogy from the outset. German law distinguishes in this regard between the attribution of conduct and the attribution of knowledge. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that case law may develop a new concept along these lines.    <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pending further development of French law regarding the attribution of knowledge, it is up to the parties to address this issue in their contracts. From the seller\u2019s perspective, it will be important to limit the scope of individuals whose knowledge is attributed to the seller\u2014or even to explicitly exclude certain individuals by name, to the extent possible\u2014since liability is not supplementary for either fraud or a breach of the duty to disclose. Conversely, it is in the buyer\u2019s interest to define the seller\u2019s knowledge as broadly as possible. Those drafting these clauses must take great care to clearly define the purpose for which the information providers are listed (for the liability warranty, the duty to disclose, fraud, etc.).   <\/p>\n<p>Dr. Antje Luke and <a href=\"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/equipe\/vincent-capelle\/\">Vincent Capelle<\/a> <\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><sup><strong>1 <\/strong><\/sup>BGHZ 117, 104 (106 ff.); NJW 1992, 1099 (1100): \u201cany person who, according to the principal\u2019s organizational structure, is responsible for representing the principal in legal proceedings, performing certain tasks under his or her own responsibility, and reviewing the resulting information and, if necessary, passing it on.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><sup><strong>2 <\/strong><\/sup>Commercial Court Decision No. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&#038;idTexte=JURITEXT000030448847&#038;fastReqId=1665288241&#038;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">14-10.965<\/a> of March 31, 2015. \u201cUse of false certificates of conformity by the target company\u2014necessity of proving that the transferor\u2019s executive was aware of the facts\u201d <\/p>\n<p><sup><strong>3<\/strong><\/sup> CCom, October 7, 2014, No. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&#038;idTexte=JURITEXT000029569444&#038;fastReqId=740027271&#038;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">13-19.758<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><sup><strong>4<\/strong><\/sup> CCom June 13, 1995, No. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&#038;idTexte=JURITEXT000007034799&#038;fastReqId=1415550937&#038;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">93-17.409<\/a>[\/vc_column_text][vc_btn title=&#8221;DOWNLOAD AND PRINT THE ARTICLE&#8221; style=&#8221;outline-custom&#8221; outline_custom_color=&#8221;#092b63&#8243; outline_custom_hover_background=&#8221;#ffc97b&#8221; outline_custom_hover_text=&#8221;#092b63&#8243; shape=&#8221;square&#8221; size=&#8221;lg&#8221; align=&#8221;left&#8221; link=&#8221;url:http%3A%2F%2Fbmhavocats.com%2Fassets%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F02%2FNewsletter-MA-ALU-FR.pdf|&#8221;][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column][vc_video link=&#8221;https:\/\/youtu.be\/Lu788xTNlR4&#8243; el_width=&#8221;50&#8243; align=&#8221;center&#8221;][vc_column_text]It is common for a buyer, following the acquisition of a company, the acquirer\u2014dissatisfied with the business\u2014attempts to seek compensation for damages based on the withholding of material information or tries to have the contract rescinded on the grounds of fraud or fraudulent concealment.M&#038;A: Attribution of Knowledge\u2014Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":31728,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[969,964],"tags":[985,986,987],"class_list":["post-31864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-article","category-less-is-more","tag-dol","tag-information","tag-ma"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Attribution of Knowledge - Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"It is common for a buyer, following the acquisition of a business\u2014and dissatisfied with the business\u2014to seek compensation for damages...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Attribution of Knowledge - Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It is common for a buyer, following the acquisition of a business\u2014and dissatisfied with the business\u2014to seek compensation for damages...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"BMH Avocats\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-19T10:02:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T10:38:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/assets\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Less-is-more.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2131\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1162\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Pauline Djerbi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@AvocatsBmh\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@AvocatsBmh\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Pauline Djerbi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Pauline Djerbi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/4fa6baf318b4161a95f786d7a17ad3e5\"},\"headline\":\"[M&#038;A] Attribution of Knowledge\u2014Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding\u2014But Who Holds the Information?\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-19T10:02:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T10:38:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1681,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/assets\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/Less-is-more.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Dol\",\"information\",\"M&amp;A\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Article\",\"Less Is More\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/\",\"name\":\"Attribution of Knowledge - Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/assets\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/Less-is-more.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-19T10:02:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T10:38:05+00:00\",\"description\":\"It is common for a buyer, following the acquisition of a business\u2014and dissatisfied with the business\u2014to seek compensation for damages...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/assets\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/Less-is-more.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/assets\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/11\\\/Less-is-more.png\",\"width\":2131,\"height\":1162},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/19\\\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/home\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[M&#038;A] Attribution of Knowledge\u2014Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding\u2014But Who Holds the Information?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"BMH Avocats\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"BMH AVOCATS\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/assets\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/Logo_Noir.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/assets\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/Logo_Noir.png\",\"width\":114,\"height\":114,\"caption\":\"BMH AVOCATS\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/AvocatsBmh\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/bmh-avocats\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCr_k0-46HIThjx44fgiHyOg5Q\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/4fa6baf318b4161a95f786d7a17ad3e5\",\"name\":\"Pauline Djerbi\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/bmhavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/pauline-djerbi\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Attribution of Knowledge - Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding","description":"It is common for a buyer, following the acquisition of a business\u2014and dissatisfied with the business\u2014to seek compensation for damages...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Attribution of Knowledge - Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding","og_description":"It is common for a buyer, following the acquisition of a business\u2014and dissatisfied with the business\u2014to seek compensation for damages...","og_url":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/","og_site_name":"BMH Avocats","article_published_time":"2019-01-19T10:02:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-30T10:38:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2131,"height":1162,"url":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/assets\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Less-is-more.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Pauline Djerbi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@AvocatsBmh","twitter_site":"@AvocatsBmh","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Pauline Djerbi","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/"},"author":{"name":"Pauline Djerbi","@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/4fa6baf318b4161a95f786d7a17ad3e5"},"headline":"[M&#038;A] Attribution of Knowledge\u2014Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding\u2014But Who Holds the Information?","datePublished":"2019-01-19T10:02:09+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-30T10:38:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/"},"wordCount":1681,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/assets\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Less-is-more.png","keywords":["Dol","information","M&amp;A"],"articleSection":["Article","Less Is More"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/","url":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/","name":"Attribution of Knowledge - Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/assets\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Less-is-more.png","datePublished":"2019-01-19T10:02:09+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-30T10:38:05+00:00","description":"It is common for a buyer, following the acquisition of a business\u2014and dissatisfied with the business\u2014to seek compensation for damages...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/assets\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Less-is-more.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/assets\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Less-is-more.png","width":2131,"height":1162},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/2019\/01\/19\/ma-attribution-of-knowledge-duty-to-disclose-fraud-and-fraudulent-withholding-but-who-holds-the-information\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/home\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[M&#038;A] Attribution of Knowledge\u2014Duty to Disclose, Fraud, and Fraudulent Withholding\u2014But Who Holds the Information?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/","name":"BMH Avocats","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"BMH AVOCATS","url":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/assets\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Logo_Noir.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/assets\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Logo_Noir.png","width":114,"height":114,"caption":"BMH AVOCATS"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/AvocatsBmh","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/bmh-avocats\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCr_k0-46HIThjx44fgiHyOg5Q"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/4fa6baf318b4161a95f786d7a17ad3e5","name":"Pauline Djerbi","url":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/author\/pauline-djerbi\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31864"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31864\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31942,"href":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31864\/revisions\/31942"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31728"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bmhavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}